Where is your child today? In English of course, the legacy of the British Empire
Essay and reflections:
Having recently returned from a 3 week tour of Burma (Myanmar) down the Irrawaddy River, where 80% of the 60 million people live on < $1 a day, I can affirm the impact of the harm not having base load electricity generation has upon the daily lives of people.
The obvious impact of no base load electricity generation is cooking, currently the default of biofuels as in charcoal, resulting in deforestation, transforming once timbered regions to savannas. People walk, ride, carry forest derived fuels further and further each year consuming more fossil fuels to retrieve the means to cook a meal.
However odious, literally and figuratively forest derived cooking fuels are, the most dramatic impact of no base load electricity generation is upon communication. It does no good to have a television, radio, computer or cellphone without electricity. There is no way to connect with immediate let alone distant others. There is no way to connect to an outside world other than by walking or using some riding liquid fossil fuel powered conveyance. Liquid fossil fuels are shipped up River and therefore are limited in amounts and quite costly: $4/liter of diesel.
The people we met and talked to, in the villages along the Irrawaddy River wanted to touch our skin. They had never before seen a white person. When asked about their ages, as they wanted to know how old we were based upon our appearances, they revealed that their 59 years old was very old, roughly in appearance to someone who was 89 years old in our group. We all looked young to them. most of us well over 59. Kathy was described by these women as young, like their 39. I muse to myself that life is hard and takes its toll on the human body early and often.
As Burma is opening to the outside world, almost like their indigenous flowering Morning Gory, there is a need to communicated to learn and understand those around themselves as well as the world in general. Fundamentally, there is no functioning internet as one needs electricity for the internet to be sustained. No internet, no effective communication in this day and age.
Without fossil fuels, especially coal since it is cheap compared to the "renewables" ($4/Kilowatt hour vs $22/ kW hr for renewables), there is no way to produce electricity for any 5 year or 10 year plan of economic and social development. Without liquid fossil fuels there is no way to push or pull the barges that can carry goods up River to the communities along its shores. Shallow water "long tail" boats do much of the hauling and ferrying with diesel outboard engines polluting the people who run the engines and the atmosphere already choking from wood fires, and dust off the deforested induced savannas.
We now hear from the IPCC wise ones that biofuels are not such a good thing:
Addressing corn for ethanol biofuel:
"Its previous assessment on climate change, in 2007, was widely condemned by environmentalists for giving the green light to large-scale biofuel production. The latest report instead puts pressure on world leaders to scrap policies promoting the use of biofuel for transport."
Before long ,so too will others learn that the fossil fuels, especially in comparison to the green renewables, are the wiser choice for the near future.
All we need to do is wait for the message to sink in: there is no such thing as a cheap sustainable green fuel just like there is no such thing as a free lunch.
Nuclear for the future, coal for the present, oil as a reflection of the past.
|